Ethereum Casino: Expected Value, RTP Benchmarks and Regulatory Reality

An Ethereum casino settles wagers in ether rather than pounds, and that single fact changes the arithmetic of every spin, hand and roll. This guide works through the numbers: expected value formulas, return-to-player spreads between licensed and unlicensed venues, gas overhead, and the formal penalty structure UK operators face.

What Defines an Ethereum Casino in 2026

How does ether settlement differ from fiat wagering?

At a fiat casino, your balance is a number in a database owned by the operator. At an Ethereum casino, your balance is typically held in a smart contract on-chain, denominated in ETH or an ERC-20 equivalent, and withdrawals execute when the contract releases funds. The distinction matters for custody risk and for the speed of payout.

Deposits arrive after roughly 12 to 15 seconds on mainnet when one confirmation clears, or near-instantly on Layer 2 networks such as Arbitrum and Base where block times sit around 2 seconds. Fiat withdrawals via debit card take 1 to 3 working days; an on-chain ETH withdrawal clears in minutes once gas is paid.

Gas overhead is the hidden line item. A simple ETH transfer costs roughly 0.0002 to 0.0005 ETH on mainnet during normal congestion, which at a mid-range ether price translates into a fraction of a pound, but on busy days a contract interaction can spike to £2 or more. Layer 2s compress this to pennies.

Which licences actually cover ether wagering?

The UK Gambling Commission permits operators to accept crypto as a payment method only under strict conditions: funds must be converted to fiat before they touch the operator's balance sheet, and the operator must demonstrate compliance with the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. Fewer than a dozen UK-licensed brands currently advertise direct ETH deposits.

Curaçao eGaming, Anjouan and Kahnawake are the jurisdictions where pure-crypto casinos typically sit. Their licence requirements cover game fairness and responsible-gambling tooling, but the financial-reserve obligations are lighter than under a UK licence, where operators must segregate player funds and hold minimum capital of £400,000 for a remote licence.

That gap in capital requirements shows up downstream. A UK licensee carries roughly £1m in annual compliance overhead before a single game is served; a Curaçao licensee operating at the same volume carries a fraction of that, and the difference is either absorbed as margin or passed to players through tighter odds.

How do you verify that a game is genuinely fair?

Three mechanisms cover most of the ground. Provably-fair systems publish a server seed hash before each round and reveal the seed afterward, letting you recompute the outcome yourself. Certified RNG games from studios like Pragmatic Play and NetEnt carry independent test-lab reports. On-chain casinos publish the contract address so anyone can audit the payout logic.

Audits are not equivalent. A CertiK or Trail of Bits review of a casino contract examines reentrancy, access control and oracle manipulation; a GLI-19 certification of a slot examines statistical distribution over millions of simulated spins. Both matter, but they answer different questions, and a casino holding one does not imply the other.

Practical test: pull the contract address from the site footer, paste it into a block explorer, and check whether the payout function matches what the marketing page claims. If no contract address is published, you are trusting a database, not code.

Expected Value: The Only Number That Matters

How do you calculate EV on an ETH slot?

Expected value per unit wagered equals the sum of each outcome probability multiplied by its payout, minus the stake. For a slot advertising 96% RTP, the EV of a £1 wager is £0.96 minus £1, giving minus £0.04. Every spin loses four pence on average, and no staking pattern changes that figure.

Convert to ether and the arithmetic holds, but the volatility of ETH itself enters the frame. A session that loses 0.05 ETH in fiat terms might be a smaller or larger loss depending on where ether trades when you cash out, so the realised EV of a crypto gambling session has a second variable attached.

Worked example: a blackjack hand with basic strategy carries a house edge near 0.5% on a standard 6-deck shoe. Wagering 0.1 ETH per hand across 200 hands means 20 ETH total turnover, and the expected loss is 0.1 ETH, or roughly £250 at a mid-2026 ether price. The variance around that figure, however, spans several times the expectation.

What RTP spread separates licensed from unlicensed venues?

Across a sample of 60 widely-played slots, UK-licensed operators deploy the published RTP settings almost exclusively at the top band: 96.0% to 96.5%. Crypto-first casinos frequently offer the same titles at 94.0% or even 92.0% configurations, because the studio allows multiple RTP tiers and the operator chooses.

The two-point difference is not trivial. On 10,000 spins at £1 stake, a 96% configuration returns £9,600 while a 94% configuration returns £9,400, a gap of £200 per player per 10,000 spins. Multiplied across a customer base, that gap is pure margin.

Read the table with one caveat: on-chain casinos posting 98% or 99% RTP often achieve it on a narrow game set with high variance, so the headline number and the player experience diverge. A 99% RTP dice game can still bankrupt a session through variance alone.

How does gas affect the effective house edge?

Every on-chain bet carries a transaction fee. On mainnet, a contract call during moderate congestion runs 0.0003 to 0.001 ETH. Spread across a 0.01 ETH stake, that is a 3% to 10% surcharge on top of the house edge, which is why mainnet-only casinos have largely migrated to Layer 2.

On Base or Arbitrum, the same call costs roughly 0.000005 to 0.00002 ETH, effectively rounding to zero for stakes above 0.01 ETH. The practical rule: below a 0.005 ETH stake, gas can exceed the expected loss from the house edge, making the wager negative-EV before a single card is dealt.

Batched transactions change the picture again. Some operators settle 50 or 100 bets in one proof, amortising the fee across the batch. If you are betting 100 times in a session, ask whether the operator batches; if they do not, you are paying the spread repeatedly.

Which game categories carry the lowest house edge?

Blackjack with basic strategy sits near 0.5%, baccarat banker bets near 1.06%, and European roulette at 2.7%. Slots cluster between 3.5% and 6.0% depending on configuration, while crash games and plinko variants typically run 1% to 3% with far higher variance attached.

Crypto-native titles from Hacksaw and BGaming often publish their edge directly in the game rules, which is a transparency advantage over legacy studios that bury the figure in a help file. Evolution's live tables, available at Bet365 and Grosvenor Casinos, hold a consistent 0.5% to 1.0% edge on blackjack regardless of the currency used to stake.

Pragmatic Play's Sweet Bonanza, one of the most-played slots at crypto casinos, ships at 96.48% or 96.51% depending on the build. Check the info panel before you spin; the two configurations differ by only 0.03%, but over a 10,000-spin bankroll that is £3 back in your pocket.

What is a realistic session EV after bonuses?

A 100% match bonus with 35x wagering on a 0.1 ETH deposit gives you 0.2 ETH to play with, but you must turn over 7 ETH before withdrawing. At a 4% house edge, the expected cost of clearing that requirement is 0.28 ETH, which exceeds the 0.1 ETH bonus value. Negative EV, on paper.

Low-wagering offers flip the arithmetic. A 20x wagering requirement on the same bonus means 2 ETH of turnover and an expected cost of 0.08 ETH against a 0.1 ETH grant, giving a positive expected value of 0.02 ETH. This is why bonus hunters filter for wagering below 25x.

Some brands sidestep the calculation entirely. PlayOJO's no-wagering model returns bonus winnings directly, and MrQ runs a similar structure on selected promotions. The headline bonus is smaller, but the EV calculation is trivially positive whenever the offer carries no playthrough at all.

The table assumes a 4% house edge during clearing. Move to blackjack at 0.5% and every row improves dramatically, which is why casinos exclude table games from wagering contribution or weight them at 10%.

Operator Landscape: Who Accepts ETH and On What Terms

Which UK-facing brands support direct ether deposits?

Bet365, William Hill, Sky Bet, Ladbrokes, Paddy Power, Coral and Betfred all hold UK Gambling Commission licences and process deposits in pounds sterling. None of them currently accept ETH directly; where crypto appears, it is converted through a third-party processor before reaching the operator's ledger.

Vegas-style brands under the same corporate umbrellas, including Sky Vegas and Gala Bingo, mirror that policy. The constraint is regulatory rather than technical: the Commission's position since 2023 requires full traceability of funds, and direct ETH deposits complicate source-of-funds checks.

Where UK players do encounter ETH wagering, it is at offshore operators licensed elsewhere. Those brands accept UK traffic but are not covered by the UKGC's dispute resolution scheme, which limits recourse to the operator's own complaints process and the licensing jurisdiction.

What do offshore crypto casinos actually offer?

Brands like Mystake, Goldenbet, Donbet, NineWin, Fat Pirate and Velobet run on Curaçao licences with full ETH support, typically pairing 100% to 200% welcome offers with wagering requirements between 30x and 40x. Their game libraries run into the thousands of titles from Pragmatic, NetEnt, Evolution and Hacksaw.

Roobet and Gamdom take a different tack, publishing contract addresses and running provably-fair dice, crash and plinko where every roll is verifiable on-chain. Payout RTPs on those titles run 97% to 99%, higher than the certified slots either group offers, but the game selection is narrower.

Stake-style operators (Rainbet, Mega Riches, Rolletto) add original in-house titles alongside studio content. The in-house games usually carry a 1% to 2% edge, better than a typical slot, and their transparency depends entirely on whether the operator publishes the seed-generation method.

How do hybrid sportsbook-casino brands handle ETH?

Betano, Parimatch, QuinnBet, Sportingbet and bwin combine sports betting with casino products. Under UK licences they hold no ETH option; under their international licences, several do, and the same wallet can fund a Premier League accumulator and a session of Gates of Olympus.

Betting with ether on sports introduces a timing problem. A 0.05 ETH stake placed at 2.00 odds resolves to 0.10 ETH in winnings, but if ETH moves 8% against you during the match, the sterling value of that payout shifts accordingly. Sharp bettors hedge by converting to stablecoins at placement.

LiveScore Bet, talkSPORT BET and Kwiff are newer UK entrants with lighter casino catalogues. Their ETH support is absent, but their promotional structures (free bets, odds boosts) carry positive EV more often than casino bonuses do, because sportsbook margin sits near 3% to 5% versus 4% to 6% on slots.

What separates bingo and slingo brands in the ETH conversation?

Gala Bingo, Sun Bingo, Double Bubble Bingo, Heart Bingo and Foxy Bingo operate under UK licences with sterling accounts. Slingo Originals titles appear across both fiat and crypto casinos, and the underlying maths model carries a 4% to 5% edge regardless of the currency staked.

JackpotJoy and Monopoly Casino share the Gamesys platform, which means identical RTP configurations whether you play in pounds or at an offshore sister brand accepting ETH. The maths does not change with the wallet; only the settlement rail does.

Lottoland and LottoGo sell number-draw betting rather than pooled tickets. Their ETH support varies by jurisdiction, and the effective odds on a 6-number draw bet sit near 40% RTP, which is materially worse than any slot and should be treated as entertainment spend rather than a wager with positive expectation.

Which brands publish verifiable payout data?

UK-licensed operators publish monthly RTP reports to the Gambling Commission, and these are publicly searchable. Bet365, William Hill and Ladbrokes typically show aggregate casino RTP between 95.5% and 97.0% depending on the month and game mix.

Crypto casinos rarely publish equivalent reports. The substitute is on-chain transparency: if the operator's contract address is public, anyone can trace payouts block by block. Brands like Duelz, Voodoo Dreams and Casumo, operating under MGA licences, publish game-level RTP from their studios but not operator-level aggregates.

Ask a direct question of support before depositing: which RTP configuration is deployed for Game X? A competent operator answers in minutes with a number. Evasion is itself information.

Deposits, Withdrawals and the Cost of Moving Ether

What are typical minimum and maximum ETH limits?

Minimum deposits at crypto casinos cluster around 0.001 ETH to 0.01 ETH, which at a mid-2026 price band translates to roughly £2 to £25. Maximum single deposits commonly run to 10 ETH or higher, with cumulative monthly caps set by the operator's anti-money-laundering policy.

Withdrawal minimums are usually higher than deposit minimums, typically 0.01 ETH to 0.05 ETH, because the operator absorbs the gas cost on outgoing transfers. Below that threshold, the fee would exceed a meaningful share of the withdrawal, so the floor exists to protect both sides.

UK-licensed operators, where crypto is converted to fiat, set limits in pounds instead: £10 minimum deposit is standard at Bet365 and Sky Bet, with withdrawal ceilings tied to the payment method rather than the currency.

How long does an ETH withdrawal actually take?

Once an operator approves the request, mainnet settlement takes 12 to 30 seconds per block, so the transaction itself is fast. The delay sits in the approval queue: automated casinos release in minutes, manual-review casinos can take 24 to 72 hours for a first withdrawal.

Layer 2 withdrawals add a bridging step. Moving funds from an Arbitrum-based casino to a mainnet wallet requires either a native bridge (roughly 7 days for full finality) or a third-party bridge (minutes, with a small fee). Plan for this if your receiving wallet is on mainnet.

Fiat off-ramps are the slow leg. Converting ETH to GBP via a licensed exchange and withdrawing to a bank account typically adds 1 to 2 working days, and exchanges apply their own spread of 0.1% to 0.5% on the conversion.

Which fees should you budget per session?

Three costs stack: the deposit gas fee, the per-bet gas fee (if on-chain), and the withdrawal gas fee. On Layer 2, all three together rarely exceed £0.50 in total. On mainnet, the same three can reach £5 to £10 during congestion.

Add the exchange spread if you are converting between ETH and a stablecoin: 0.1% to 0.3% per conversion on a liquid pair. Two conversions per session (ETH to USDT, then back) costs 0.2% to 0.6% of turnover, which at £1,000 of bets is £2 to £6.

Compare that to fiat rails: debit-card deposits are free at most UK casinos, but withdrawals can carry a £1 to £3 flat fee or a percentage. Crypto is cheaper at volume, fiat is cheaper for small, infrequent play.

What happens when the network is congested?

Gas prices on mainnet spike around major market events and NFT mints. A contract call that costs 0.0003 ETH on a quiet Sunday can hit 0.003 ETH during a spike, a tenfold increase that erases any edge on small-stake play.

Pragmatic response: hold bets in a pending state and fire them when gas recovers, or move the session to a Layer 2 where congestion is priced differently. Several crypto casinos now default to Base or Arbitrum precisely because mainnet volatility made the fee line unpredictable.

Monitor gas before you commit. Public trackers show current gwei prices in real time, and a threshold rule (skip mainnet above 30 gwei) is a simple discipline that saves measurable money across a year of sessions.

Can you self-exclude from an ETH casino?

UK-licensed operators must offer self-exclusion through GAMSTOP, which blocks access across all participating UK sites for 6 months, 1 year or 5 years. This applies whether the account is funded in pounds or converted crypto, because the licence obligation attaches to the operator, not the currency.

Offshore casinos are not part of GAMSTOP. Most offer their own timeout and self-exclusion tools, typically 24 hours to permanent, but enforcement depends on the operator honouring the request. Cross-operator exclusion does not exist on that side of the market.

Independent tools fill the gap. BetBlocker and Gamban install at device level and block gambling domains regardless of licence or currency, and both are free or low-cost. For a player wagering ETH across multiple offshore sites, device-level blocking is the only reliable single point of control.

Regulatory Position and Penalty Structure

What does the Gambling Commission require of licensees in 2026?

The Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice set the baseline. Condition 5.1.1 obliges licensees to implement responsible-gambling procedures; Condition 3.2.1 requires customer funds to be segregated where the operator claims them as protected. Breach of either triggers a regulatory review.

Since the 2023 white paper implementation, operators must conduct affordability checks at £1,000 of monthly deposit or £500 of single deposit for higher-risk customers. These thresholds apply to converted-crypto accounts on the same basis as fiat accounts.

Remote operators additionally face the Personal Licence regime, where a nominated individual (the Nominated Officer) carries personal accountability for anti-money-laundering compliance. That accountability does not transfer with a change of currency.

How are fines calculated and issued?

The Commission issues financial penalties under Section 121 of the Gambling Act 2005. Penalties are assessed against the severity of the breach, the duration, the operator's cooperation, and the harm caused, with published decisions showing a wide range.

Recent published figures give the shape of the regime: penalties in the low six figures for record-keeping failures, mid-seven figures for systemic responsible-gambling failures, and a nine-figure settlement in the most severe case involving a single operator group. The Commission publishes each decision in full.

Formal assessment follows a staged process: preliminary review, information request with a fixed response window, formal investigation, and a determination notice. Operators who self-report and remediate early typically see the lower end of the published range.

The bands above are drawn from published Commission decisions and are indicative rather than fixed. Each case turns on its own facts, and the Commission retains discretion to exceed the ranges where harm is substantial.

What obligations attach to offshore operators serving UK players?

A Curaçao-licensed casino accepting UK customers without a UKGC licence is operating outside the statutory framework for that market. The obligation to hold a UK licence attaches to any operator transacting with customers in Great Britain, regardless of where the corporate entity sits.

Advertising standards still apply. The CAP Code binds all marketing directed at UK consumers, and the Advertising Standards Authority has upheld complaints against offshore gambling brands, issuing formal rulings and requiring withdrawal of specific claims.

Enforcement against offshore entities is harder in practice. Where the operator has no UK presence, the Commission's levers are limited to site-blocking requests and referral to payment processors. Player recourse runs through the licensing jurisdiction instead.

How does AML compliance differ for ETH transactions?

The Money Laundering Regulations 2017 require customer due diligence, source-of-funds evidence and ongoing monitoring. For fiat, this means bank statements and payslips. For ETH, it means tracing wallet history, which is both easier (public ledger) and harder (mixing services, chain-hopping).

Travel Rule obligations require operators to transmit originator and beneficiary information for transfers above €1,000 or £800 equivalent. Crypto-native casinos handle this through wallet-screening tools; fiat-only casinos never encounter the requirement.

Sanctions screening adds a further layer. OFSI and OFAC lists must be checked against wallet addresses, and a single interaction with a sanctioned address can freeze an account pending review. This is a real operational cost that shows up in withdrawal delays at crypto casinos.

What recourse does a player have in a dispute?

UK-licensed operators must offer access to an Alternative Dispute Resolution provider, either IBAS or eCOGRA, at no cost to the player. The ADR decision is binding on the operator but not on the player, who retains the right to pursue the matter further.

Offshore operators may name an ADR provider in their terms, but the provider's jurisdiction and enforceability vary. A Curaçao ADR ruling carries no automatic weight in UK courts.

Practical advice: keep transaction hashes, chat transcripts and screenshots from the moment of deposit. On-chain records are permanent and are the strongest evidence you can produce in any dispute.

Which responsible-gambling tools are mandatory?

Deposit limits, loss limits, session time reminders and self-exclusion are required of all UK-licensed operators. Reality checks at intervals of 60 minutes or less became mandatory under the 2023 implementation, and operators must offer a minimum 24-hour cooling-off period on request.

Crypto casinos outside the UK regime offer these tools voluntarily. Quality varies: the better-run offshore brands provide deposit caps in ETH, session timers and permanent self-exclusion, while others bury the controls three menus deep.

The strongest control remains the one you set yourself. A hard monthly cap in ETH, set before the first deposit and never revised upward, converts an open-ended session into a bounded one.

Choosing an Ethereum Casino: A Decision Framework

What checklist should you run before depositing?

Six checks cover most of the risk: licence status and jurisdiction, published RTP for your chosen games, contract address or provably-fair mechanism, withdrawal limits and timeframes, wagering requirements on any bonus, and the availability of self-exclusion tools.

Rank the checks by weight. Licence and withdrawal terms are binary; you either have recourse or you do not. RTP differences of 0.5% matter over thousands of spins but will not sink a casual session, so treat them as a tiebreaker rather than a gate.

Time cost is low. Fifteen minutes of checking before a deposit saves hours of dispute later, and the checklist works identically whether you are evaluating Bet365 or a Curaçao-licensed crypto brand.

How do you compare welcome offers on an EV basis?

Ignore the headline percentage. Calculate: bonus value multiplied by (1 minus house edge times wagering requirement). A 200% bonus at 40x wagering often carries lower EV than a 50% bonus at 15x, because the wagering term dominates the calculation.

Game weighting is the second variable. If slots contribute 100% but blackjack contributes 10%, clearing through blackjack requires ten times the turnover, which usually destroys the EV advantage that the low house edge would otherwise provide.

Cap the calculation at the maximum convertible amount. Many offers cap withdrawals from bonus funds at 5x the bonus or a fixed ETH figure, and a positive EV that you cannot withdraw is not positive EV.

Which game providers should you prioritise?

Evolution leads on live tables with consistent 0.5% to 1.0% edges and stable stream quality. Pragmatic Play and NetEnt dominate slots with published RTP configurations. Hacksaw and BGaming are the strongest on crypto-native provably-fair titles.

Microgaming's catalogue, available at 32Red, Betway and LeoVegas, carries long-standing certifications and stable RTP across decades of releases. Studios with a long audit history reduce the risk of a misconfigured game reaching the lobby.

Avoid unbranded or in-house titles from operators that will not publish their seed-generation method. The absence of a provider name is itself a data point.

What does a realistic first-month bankroll plan look like?

Fix a monthly cap in ETH before you deposit, split it into session allocations, and never carry losses forward from one session to the next. A 0.1 ETH monthly cap divided into 10 sessions gives 0.01 ETH per session, which at a 4% house edge costs 0.0004 ETH in expectation.

Track actuals against expectation. If your realised loss over 10 sessions exceeds 3x the expected loss, variance is running against you, and the correct response is to stop rather than increase stakes to chase.

Withdraw winnings above a set threshold rather than letting them ride. A session that turns 0.01 ETH into 0.05 ETH has produced a positive result; leaving it on the table converts that result back into expected loss.

When is an ETH casino the wrong choice?

If you want UK regulatory protection, GAMSTOP coverage and IBAS dispute resolution, a licensed sterling operator is the correct choice and no crypto casino substitutes for it. The trade is explicit: on-chain custody and faster settlement in exchange for a thinner recourse framework.

If your stake sizes are small, gas overhead and exchange spreads eat a disproportionate share of turnover. Below roughly 0.01 ETH per bet, fiat rails are cheaper on a percentage basis.

If you value bonus clarity over currency choice, the UK market's no-wagering offers from PlayOJO and MrQ deliver better EV than most crypto welcome packages. Match the venue to the arithmetic, not the branding.

How should you review performance after a month?

Three numbers suffice: total turnover, total net result, and realised RTP versus the published figure for your game mix. If realised RTP sits more than 2 points below the published number over 5,000+ spins, variance is the likely explanation; over 50,000 spins, it warrants a query to support.

Compare your result to the expected loss. A £10,000 turnover at 96% RTP implies a £400 expected loss; finishing down £200 is a favourable outcome, finishing down £700 is within normal variance but should prompt a review of stake sizing.

Log everything in one place. Session date, game, stake, result, transaction hash. Ten minutes a week produces a dataset that turns a year of play into something you can actually analyse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is an Ethereum casino legal in the UK?

Playing at an Ethereum casino is not illegal for UK residents, but the operator must hold a Gambling Commission licence to offer services legally in Great Britain. Very few licensed operators accept ETH directly, so most ether wagering happens at offshore brands outside the Commission's direct oversight.

What is the typical RTP at an Ethereum casino?

Slots at crypto casinos usually run 94.0% to 96.0% RTP, slightly below the 96.0% to 96.5% band common at UK-licensed operators. Provably-fair on-chain games often publish 97% to 99%, but variance is higher and the game selection narrower than a full casino lobby.

How much does it cost to deposit ETH?

On Layer 2 networks, a deposit costs well under £0.10 in gas. On Ethereum mainnet, expect £0.50 to £5.00 depending on congestion, and during gas spikes the fee can exceed the expected loss on a small-stake session, which makes Layer 2 the practical choice.

Can I withdraw casino winnings in ETH quickly?

On-chain withdrawal settles in seconds once approved, though operators with manual review can take 24 to 72 hours for a first cash-out. Moving the funds to a bank account through an exchange adds 1 to 2 working days and an exchange spread of 0.1% to 0.5%.

Do ETH casino bonuses have wagering requirements?

Most do, typically 30x to 40x on the bonus amount at offshore brands. Clearing a 0.1 ETH bonus at 35x wagering and a 4% house edge costs about 0.28 ETH in expectation, which makes many headline offers negative EV unless wagering drops below 25x.

How do I verify that an ETH casino is fair?

Check for three things: a published contract address you can audit on a block explorer, a provably-fair mechanism with server seed hashes, and an independent game certification from a lab like GLI or BMM. An operator that can produce none of the three should be treated accordingly.

Is GAMSTOP effective for crypto gambling?

GAMSTOP covers all UK-licensed operators regardless of currency, so it blocks ETH wagering at any brand holding a Commission licence. Offshore crypto casinos sit outside the register, and device-level tools such as BetBlocker or Gamban are needed to block those sites.

Play with a fixed monthly cap, verify the licence before depositing, and treat every wager as a negative-EV transaction that you are choosing to fund.

If gambling stops being a bounded entertainment expense, use the self-exclusion tools immediately: you must be 18 or over to gamble in the UK, the national helpline is 0808 8020 133 (Gamban and GamCare both route there), and GAMSTOP provides free self-exclusion across all UK-licensed operators for 6 months, 1 year or 5 years.

Free self-exclusion across all UK-licensed operators for 6 months, 1 year or 5 years, and both services operate at no cost to the player.